Au 79 EA MT5 review. Au 79 EA MT5 combines fast gold scalping with slower breakout engines on one XAUUSD chart. Separate strategy exposure, protective stops and account drawdown controls are designed to coordinate these different trading horizons.
Our assessment: Appealing for buyers who want a configurable mix of fast and slow gold trading. Its drawdown controls are concrete features, but the young public account and overlapping gold exposure deserve more weight than claims of smoother returns.
View Au 79 EA MT5 and current pricing

- Developer source link: Au 79 EA MT5 on MQL5
- Live signal link: View the public MT5 account
Sources checked 16 September 2026: the developer listing, available release notes, original gallery and linked public evidence. This is a source-based review, not a claim that CheaperForex independently ran this EA.
What four engines can and cannot diversify
Using different holding periods can change when a system trades. It does not create four independent markets. All components still face the same gold price, spreads and liquidity shocks. The developer’s claim that opposing exposure absorbs whipsaws is an architectural explanation, not a guarantee that losses offset. A series of reversals can close both directions at a loss. Confirm that the account supports the intended opposing positions; netting changes how simultaneous orders interact.
Reading the risk module accurately
The daily baseline is server-midnight equity, while the total rule uses the initial deposit. These definitions need to match the buyer’s own account rules. A default early-trigger fraction of 90% creates a buffer, but gaps, slippage and disconnects can still move the final result beyond it. Persistent state is useful because restarting should not reset the loss allowance. It is not evidence that every broker or challenge rule has been tested.
Current public account: modest gains and losing months
The 16 September 2026 capture of signal 2381943 showed 6.55% growth, 54 trades and profit factor 1.16 on InstaForex-Server. MQL5 reported ten weeks, starting 13 July 2026, before the retail listing’s August publication. Relative balance drawdown was 10.80%, while relative equity drawdown was 5.11%; maximal balance drawdown was separately 10.83%. July lost 6.18%, August gained 20.42% and September-to-date lost 5.69%. Average losing trades were larger than average winners. MQL5 displayed a young-account warning. This is an early observation, not a multi-year live validation of all four engines.
Historical report: the larger drawdown also matters
The developer’s 2018–September 2026 test reports 4,148 trades and profit factor 2.43. Its promotional card highlights 8.23% maximal equity drawdown; the report also lists 14.64% relative equity drawdown. Both fields should remain visible. Neither figure is a live account loss limit. The monthly simulation table is useful for inspecting uneven returns, but we have not reproduced the test or audited broker-cost assumptions.
Release notes resolve an outdated strategy count
The overview mixes references to three and four engines. The 4 September update explicitly adds engine four, so current feature copy uses four without claiming the public account ran that configuration throughout its history. Switching off the cost-sensitive scalper changes the strategy mix, and comparisons should use the settings actually selected.

Customer feedback and its limits
One customer review was visible, dated 26 August 2026. It praised the combination of fast and slower trading and the developer’s help. That is a useful early setup impression, but one review predating the fourth-engine update does not demonstrate long-term results.

Original developer images and reports
These original images are retained as source material. Simulations and promotional graphics are distinct from the genuine MQL5 signal captures above. Open an image to inspect its labels and report fields.



Choosing this system
The linked signal has a short history and losing months; the review also explains a drawdown figure omitted from the promotional headline. Appealing for buyers who want a configurable mix of fast and slow gold trading. Its drawdown controls are concrete features, but the young public account and overlapping gold exposure deserve more weight than claims of smoother returns.
Read the developer release notes
More from Ivan Pochta
Compare the different markets and strategy designs; sharing a developer does not mean sharing the same performance.