My AI Gold EA MT5 trades XAUUSD using an AI-labelled strategy, embedded parameters and a selectable risk profile. The developer states that it uses stop loss and take profit without grid, martingale or averaging. Its headline growth is striking, but buyers need to distinguish the high-risk MT4 record from the separate, newly opened IC Markets MT5 account.
View My AI Gold EA MT5 features and pricing →

Sources checked 11 September 2026. This is a review of public documentation, account statistics and customer feedback, not our own independent forward test.
What does My AI Gold actually do?
Vitalii Kosov’s official listing describes a gold-only system that combines neural-network analysis with embedded trading parameters. The practical setup is simple: attach it to XAUUSD, choose the risk profile and let the EA manage entries and protective levels. The author says any chart timeframe can be used.
The AI description mentions custom architecture and GitHub frameworks, but the linked public material does not identify a specific model or repository that we can inspect. We can describe the advertised approach; we cannot independently verify the underlying neural-network implementation from this material.
The author also characterises the strategy as something to judge over three to four months, rather than over a handful of sessions. That is a useful expectation for evaluating consistency, but it is not a reason to ignore abnormal exposure or technical errors during a test.
Two signals, two very different evidence bases
The product links a high-risk account on Weltrade and a new IC Markets account. They differ in platform, funding and trading history. Combining their most attractive details into a single description would misrepresent the evidence.
High-risk Weltrade account: growth with substantial drawdown
The primary signal is labelled a real MetaTrader 4 account on Weltrade-Live, with 1:500 leverage. It showed 999.43% growth from an initial $300, with no additional deposits or withdrawals displayed. Balance and equity were both $3,298.29 at the capture.

- Trades
- 87 XAUUSD trades: 68 winners and 19 losers.
- Profit factor
- 1.87, as reported in the signal statistics.
- Relative balance drawdown
- 43.59% ($816.05).
- Relative equity drawdown
- 9.56% ($350.05), a separate reported field.
- Trade duration / frequency
- About six hours on average; approximately four trades per week.
- Worst closed trade
- A loss of $446.75.
The 43.59% balance drawdown is material context for the growth figure. Reporting only 9.56% equity drawdown would leave readers with an incomplete picture. We retain both fields as MQL5 displays them; we do not have enough information to reconcile their historical measurement coverage. Neither figure is a ceiling on future losses.
MQL5 explicitly warns about unusually high growth in the preceding month. The account’s own high-risk label is consistent with the need to evaluate the loss experience, rather than assuming that the gain reflects conservative exposure.
Account history is longer than the monitoring period
The page displayed 17 weeks of account history, including monthly figures from May 2026, but its monitoring start was 3 September 2026. The retail listing was published on 4 September. Those earlier trades therefore should not be described as 17 weeks of continuous public monitoring of the current retail MT5 product.
The signal description links back to My AI Gold, but it does not map every historical trade to a particular build or risk profile. That distinction matters when comparing the older MT4 curve with the software now offered for MT5.
IC Markets MT5 account: no trading record yet
The second account, named My AI Gold ICmarkets 10k Low Risk, is labelled a real MT5 account on ICMarketsSC-MT5-3, also at 1:500 leverage. Monitoring began on 8 September 2026. At our check it held its initial $10,000 with zero trades, zero profit and zero growth.

This account could become a more directly relevant source for evaluating the MT5 edition once it has meaningful activity. For now, it cannot establish a win rate, drawdown profile or broker-to-broker consistency. Zero drawdown on an account with no trades is not evidence of low trading risk, and the Weltrade growth must not be attributed to IC Markets.
Does the stated 1:2 risk-to-reward match the results?
The product advertises a 1:2 risk-to-reward design. The primary signal’s realised money averages were $94.79 per winning trade and $181.44 per losing trade. Those statistics do not demonstrate winners twice the size of losers.
This comparison alone does not disprove the ratio of initial stop-loss and take-profit distances: varying position sizes, actual exits and account growth can affect money averages. It does mean that a buyer should check the current risk profile, initial protective levels and realised outcomes rather than assume the headline ratio describes the historical closed trades.
Customer review: a positive first impression
There was one customer review at the time of checking. Roman Kazhokin, writing on 8 September, reported profitable initial trades on Vantage and said they matched the author’s signal so far.

That is useful early feedback on execution at another broker, but it is explicitly about the first trades. It supplies neither a long observation period nor a full account record. One favourable comment does not resolve the questions about current-build consistency or drawdown.
Settings, documentation and practical evaluation
The overview gives the basic chart and risk-profile instructions, but we found no separate public manual linked in the listing, comments or signal description. The two public comments were from the developer and included an additional results image; they did not provide a detailed input reference. The listing showed version 1.3 at this check.
Before changing risk, establish how each profile sizes exposure on your gold contract. Keep a record of the build, selected profile, spread and commission, and compare equity as well as closed profit. A restart test and inspection of protective orders can help check that the installation behaves as intended.
The developer promotes broad broker compatibility and prop-firm use. These claims do not establish suitability for every broker or challenge. Execution costs and each firm’s current drawdown and EA rules still need to be checked; passing a challenge is not guaranteed by the product description.
Related products and buying perspective
CheaperForex also stocks Euro Bot FX EA MT4 by Vitalii Kosov. It is a separate EURUSD product, so shared authorship should not be treated as shared strategy or transferable performance. For a different gold-system comparison, see DowGold MT5 and evaluate its own approach and account history separately.
My AI Gold costs $249.95 through CheaperForex. Its clearest appeal is focused XAUUSD automation with simple controls and an explicitly stated alternative to averaging-based recovery. The main buying consideration is the gap between the dramatic older high-risk result and the amount of directly observable trading from the newly linked MT5 account.
My AI Gold review FAQs
Is the near-1,000% result from IC Markets?
No. At our 11 September 2026 check, 999.43% growth was shown on the high-risk MT4 account at Weltrade-Live. The separate MT5 IC Markets account had zero trades and no growth.
Why show both balance and equity drawdown?
MQL5 reported 43.59% relative balance drawdown and 9.56% relative equity drawdown on the primary signal. These are different fields and should not be substituted for each other. We do not have enough information to reconcile their historical measurement coverage.
Does the 1:2 risk-to-reward claim match average trade results?
The developer describes a 1:2 risk-to-reward design, but the primary signal showed a $94.79 average winning trade and a $181.44 average losing trade. These realised money averages do not demonstrate that ratio; position sizes and actual exits can affect the comparison.
How much independent testing is included in this review?
This is an assessment of public product information, two linked signal pages and the available customer review. It is not a CheaperForex forward test, an audit of the EA code or a guarantee that another account will reproduce the results.
Official product listing · Weltrade MT4 signal · IC Markets MT5 signal · Developer comments