Golden Blitz EA trades gold through three strategy modules, candle-range stops and adjustable trailing exits. This review compares the MT4 and MT5 editions and examines what the original images actually show.
View product details and current pricing.
Updated 13 September 2026. Research based on the current MQL5 listing, release notes, source images and customer reviews. We have not independently forward-tested the EA or audited its code.
How to choose between MT4 and MT5
- Golden Blitz MT4
- The existing MetaTrader 4 edition remains available at CheaperForex. Its former marketplace listing has been removed. Our saved MT4 offer identifies version 2.0; MT5 release numbers do not establish an MT4 update.
- Golden Blitz MT5
- The MetaTrader 5 edition is $699.95 at publication, supplied as a standalone file. The source listing currently shows build 3.0.
- Shared trading concept
- Both are gold-focused editions. Use the executable and preset format for your platform, and assess your broker’s costs rather than assuming identical results.
The MT5 release notes add per-strategy customisation in October 2025. Earlier changes introduce a time filter, correct Friday pending-order handling and fix an intermittent stop-loss issue. These are useful reasons to check your installed build and inputs; they do not prove improved live returns.
Three strategies still share one market
Enabling several entry modules does not diversify away from gold. A sharp XAUUSD move can affect all open positions together. Review aggregate exposure, the distance to each stop and the effect of a spread increase before choosing lot sizes. A trailing exit can also behave differently when execution costs change.
The developer’s account-size references increase with the number of active modules. Treat those figures as setup references, not as loss limits. The current listing recommends raw low-spread conditions, while a stable terminal connection is needed for ongoing management.
What the latest developer result image shows
In July 2026 the developer posted an image claiming more than $7,000 profit, approximately 15% maximum drawdown and an 18-month record. Its curve includes pullbacks and a period of uneven progress. The image does not expose a complete downloadable account statement, deposit history or a verifiable monitoring page, so these remain developer-reported figures.
The listing’s result link leads to these developer comments. That is different from a current independent signal feed. The promotional bonuses and limited-slot wording visible in the original image are historical source offers, not terms of a CheaperForex purchase.
The older Gold Isis signal is historical evidence
This older gallery screenshot displays roughly 57% growth and a nine-week history under the former Gold Isis name. Its broker label reads ICMarketsSC-Live33. The previously cited signal link was unavailable when checked. We therefore cannot use the picture to verify today’s results, or attribute a continuous multi-year record to it.
It is also a different account-size context from the developer’s later $10,000 example. Combining those snapshots into one continuous track record would be misleading.
Original backtests: compare drawdown before profit
The developer gallery contains five distinct risk-level reports plus a repeated low-risk image. The reports are simulations, not live account returns. Relative equity drawdown changes markedly across them:
- Very low risk
- 6.55% relative equity drawdown.
- Low risk
- 16.34% relative equity drawdown; 1.99 profit factor.
- Medium risk
- 30.97% relative equity drawdown.
- High risk
- 43.30% relative equity drawdown.
- Very high risk
- 54.10% relative equity drawdown.
In the low-risk report, the average losing trade is larger than the average winning trade. Its high historical win rate therefore matters to that result: a weaker winning proportion could change the outcome considerably. Neither a preset label nor a past recovery factor sets a ceiling on future losses.
See the medium, high and very-high risk reports
There is also a source-label inconsistency: the medium report says 2020–2022, while most other reports say 2020–2025, despite matching trade counts. We retain that label rather than silently correcting it or presenting the reports as a fully controlled comparison.
Trade examples: useful detail, incomplete history
The September 2025 extracts show multiple gold entries, different lot sizes and recorded stop levels. They help illustrate the mechanics, but selected closed-trade rows exclude the rest of the account history and do not demonstrate the worst open loss.
Customer feedback: positive experience with caveats
The MT5 page displayed 16 reviews and a 4.43 rating at our check. Recent feedback praises stability and developer support. One customer describes a short period using a low-risk single-strategy setup; older comments discuss the former Gold Isis name.
The feedback is not uniformly positive: one customer reports an operating problem, and another describes both wins and losses. The developer disputes the first complaint and encourages longer observation in the second. Those exchanges do not resolve the underlying experiences independently. Small, self-selected review samples are useful context, not a substitute for complete trading records.
Read the original MQL5 reviews for the full discussion. These are third-party customer opinions and are not CheaperForex verified-purchase ratings.
Practical checks before using a preset
- Confirm that the executable, terminal and settings file belong to the same edition.
- Check gold contract size, spread, commission and lot step with your broker.
- Test the selected modules together; several individually small positions can create a large combined risk.
- Check stop placement and Friday handling on the installed build, particularly given the historical fixes.
- Assess open equity and losing periods, not just closed-profit totals.
Our conclusion
Golden Blitz’s configurable strategy structure and openly published range of risk outcomes are its strongest research points. We would give more weight to those controls and to a current account test than to the largest compounded backtest figure. The MT5 edition offers documented customisation changes; the retained MT4 edition serves traders already using that platform.
Questions about Golden Blitz
Is Golden Blitz the same name as Gold Isis?
Older screenshots and reviews on the current Golden Blitz listing use the Gold Isis name. Treat these as historical evidence rather than assuming every comment describes the current build.
Do the public screenshots prove current live performance?
No. The current listing links to developer-posted result images. The older signal link was unavailable at our check, so we could not verify a current independently monitored account.
Is the MT4 edition still available at CheaperForex?
Yes. The MT4 product remains available separately from the MT5 edition, even though its former MQL5 listing is no longer available.
Does enabling three strategies diversify across markets?
No. All three operate on gold. Different entry rules can still lose together during the same market move, so total position exposure matters.