The Machine by New Capital MT5 is a mean-reversion EA for AUDCAD, AUDNZD and NZDCAD. It combines pullback entries with adjustable trade management and recovery sizing. Its appeal is a defined set of forex crosses and an accessible account record; its main consideration is the floating exposure that can accompany martingale recovery.
Our assessment: worth comparing for traders comfortable evaluating recovery strategies, rather than treating a smooth balance curve as evidence of low risk. The public record spans roughly two years, but recent performance is weaker and its swap-free condition matters. This is a review of published evidence, not our own forward test.
View The Machine MT5 — $899.95 →

What the strategy asks the market to do
The developer’s listing describes taking the other side of an extended move and waiting for a pullback. In practical terms, that creates a different trade-off from following a breakout: a ranging market may offer repeated reversals, while a persistent trend can keep a position underwater.
All three pairs share currencies with one another. Running three charts therefore does not automatically create three independent sources of risk. A sustained AUD, NZD or CAD move can affect more than one position at the same time. Review total exposure across the account, not just each chart’s initial lot.
Recovery limits need to be read together
The settings overview includes an optional recovery switch, a multiplier and a maximum number of additional orders. Raising a cap can give a sequence more room to recover, but also allows more capital to be exposed. Reducing the starting lot does not by itself describe the largest position that a sequence could reach.
Equity thresholds deserve a separate test: check what they close, whether they stop further entries and how they behave with several charts running. A software threshold is not a guaranteed fill price. Spread changes, slippage and financing can affect the realised loss.
The linked IC Markets account
The linked MT5 signal was marked as a real account on ICMarketsSC-MT5-2, with 1:500 leverage. Its displayed start was 15 September 2024. The original screenshots below were captured on 11 September 2026.

- Growth / profit
- 79.25% growth; €792.33 trading profit.
- Trade sample
- 1,215 trades; 76.21% winners; profit factor 1.57.
- Balance / equity
- €1,792.33 balance and €1,787.18 equity at capture.
- Funding
- €1,000 initial deposit; €731.80 later deposits and the same amount withdrawn.
- Drawdown
- 18.97% relative equity drawdown; 8.18% relative balance drawdown. Separate maximal balance field: 8.19% (€137.48).
- Holding time
- Two days on average; account marked 99% algorithmic trading.
The equal later deposits and withdrawals leave net added funding at zero, but this is still an account with cash flows. Use the platform’s growth calculation rather than treating a changing balance as a simple return. The equity figure also shows a small floating loss at the capture time.
Why the equity drawdown matters more than the smooth line

The larger equity drawdown indicates a deeper decline when open positions are included than is visible in closed-trade balance alone. For a recovery system, that is central to the buying decision: account limits and available margin can be affected before a basket closes.
Historical maximum drawdown is a record of what this account experienced. It does not establish the most the EA could lose under different sizing or a future sustained trend. Compare the cash impact of the chosen settings against the capital you can actually expose.
Recent months and the swap-free condition
The public table showed −6.09% in January 2026, −0.16% in August and −1.36% for September to the check date. September is incomplete. Those losses sit within a positive cumulative record, but contradict any expectation of uninterrupted monthly gains.
The provider’s June 2025 updates say the account is not charged swaps. Since positions average two days, overnight financing is a meaningful comparison point. A standard account with different swap rates, commissions or spread behaviour may produce a different net outcome even if entries match. Check each pair and trade direction, including rollover days.
Where the published descriptions need caution
The product description references roughly 2,700 trades and a 1.77 profit factor. Those are not the current figures on the linked account above. We could not reconcile them to that record, so this review uses the directly observed statistics.
The signal’s own description also contains conflicting wording: it promotes reliable monthly returns but later says it does not maintain a long-term live record and describes experimental use. Meanwhile a public account is visibly available. Treat that text as inconsistent documentation, not proof that the displayed history is fabricated. The product listing separately says the signal may be paused or restarted when risk limits are reached; record continuity should be checked over time.
Reviews, documentation and practical checks
The MQL5 product reviews section showed no customer reviews, and the public comments page contained no discussion at this check. The signal likewise had no reviews. There are therefore no buyer testimonials or third-party star scores to reproduce.
The release notes dated 10 July 2024 describe equity-stop controls, entry randomisation and adjustable trade distance. The listing’s parameter names are illustrative and may differ by build. Its support channel requires sign-in; we did not find a separate public manual or downloadable pair presets to inspect.
Before choosing risk settings, establish the actual chart period from the relevant preset, test with realistic costs, and examine consecutive losing sequences rather than only the final profit. Funding-account compatibility must be checked against the specific firm’s rules; a product description mentioning challenges is not confirmation that recovery trading is permitted.
Is The Machine worth considering at $899.95?
The case for considering it is the focused market selection, adjustable controls and a longer public account history than many newly launched EAs. The counterweight is recovery exposure, weaker recent months and documentation that does not consistently match the linked record. At this price, validating the actual presets and account costs should be part of the decision.
For a separate forex comparison, see Boring Pips MT5 and its signal and risk review. For a different market approach, see DowGold MT5. These comparisons are not claims that one account’s percentage return predicts another EA’s results.
The Machine review FAQs
Is The Machine a gold trading robot?
No. Its stated markets are AUDCAD, AUDNZD and NZDCAD. All three also appear in the linked account’s trading distribution.
Does the live record prove it is low risk?
No. Historical drawdown is not a limit on future losses, and a profitable record does not remove the risks of recovery sizing. Assess floating equity, position exposure and loss limits together.
Are there MQL5 customer reviews?
The product listing showed no customer reviews at the 11 September 2026 check. The signal also showed no reviews. This article is an editorial assessment of public sources, not a collection of verified buyer ratings.
Has CheaperForex independently tested this EA?
No independent forward test or code audit is claimed here. The review examines the live public account, product description, release notes and documentation available at the stated check date.
Official MT5 product · Public signal · Release notes · Developer’s products