Gold Liquidity V2 MT5 Review: Strategy, Settings and Customer Feedback
Gold Liquidity V2 MT5 targets short-term XAUUSD moves on M1 using liquidity-sweep and momentum concepts. Its documented controls include trend filtering, automatic session detection, dynamic profit targets and configurable daily profit/loss limits.
Our assessment: the focused gold setup and configurable exits may appeal to traders comfortable testing active multi-position systems. The strongest reason for care is the evidence gap: selected profitable trade histories and enthusiastic testimonials do not establish a long-term live record, and the latest customer feedback includes losses.
View Gold Liquidity V2 MT5 features and pricing
- Developer source link: Gold Liquidity V2 on MQL5
- Live signal link: No public monitored account linked in the listing or seller page at our 17 September 2026 check.
- Developer settings: Public $500 preset · Release notes
What the liquidity strategy description establishes
The developer identifies liquidity sweeps, stop-loss clusters, short-term inefficiencies and momentum as the main ideas. These explain the intended opportunity but do not disclose enough entry logic for independent replication. The description’s ambitious monthly-growth claim is not a verified expected return and is not used as a forecast here.
The source images show groups of trades closing close together, and the public preset contains a maximum-order input. This should not be represented as a single-position or necessarily no-grid system. The overview does not fully explain how every additional entry is generated, so that mechanism should be checked in the supplied settings and forward testing rather than inferred from a profitable screenshot.
The public preset: available controls are not enabled controls
At our check, the linked preset specified Lots=0.01 and Max_Order=999. The latter is a very loose configured ceiling, not a recommendation that opening hundreds of positions is suitable. Lot multiplication was disabled, as were the daily profit limit, daily loss limit and trading-hours switch. The moving-average filter, Bollinger-band exit and automatic GMT offset were enabled.
This distinction matters: a page can accurately list daily risk controls while the particular downloaded configuration leaves them off. The file also contains a Close_money value of 10, but does not provide a visible dynamic-target parameter. The overview tells users to use a dynamic target and the August release notes describe it; that is not enough to assume this preset enables every current feature. Review the actual inputs after loading it. We inspected the text file, not an independently executed EA test.
Release history and session closure
The 9 August 2026 update adds a trend filter and reduces the stated default balance to $500. The 11 August notes add automatic session detection and dynamic take profit, enhance daily limits and trend-change loss closure, and fix lot multiplication while explicitly marking it not recommended.
An earlier June discussion explains that, with the developer’s recommended settings and hours, open positions are closed at session end even if still losing or recovering. That is a risk-management exit, not a promise that every cycle recovers. The downloaded preset’s trading-hours switch is off, so the June explanation should not be assumed to describe every configuration. Older update notes also say some features were removed; avoid treating all historical features as concurrently active today.
What the recent trade-history images show
The August mobile images show individual 0.1-lot gold trades and history totals of 976.90 and 603.20. They show selected closed results, not the initial equity, a complete deposit/withdrawal record or a time-series drawdown calculation. The account currency and real-versus-demo status are not established by these crops. They cannot substantiate an account-growth percentage.
The expanded trade detail in the first image displays dashes for S/L and T/P on that particular record. This alone does not establish every trade’s protection or the complete exit mechanism. It does mean the screenshot should not be used to claim universal broker-side stop protection.
Original expanded trade detail
Older gallery images need their dates and cash flows
The remaining images show March and April 2026 trades, predating later strategy and protection changes. One displays profit of 11,633.32, withdrawals of 15,333.00 and a history balance of −3,699.68. A filtered history total is not necessarily the account’s current equity; it should neither be presented as a verified growth result nor described as proof of a negative live account balance.
Original March and April trade-history images
Several trades are visible with differing lot sizes, while another image shows a 3,622.61 history total. Without the complete account record, the images cannot establish capital at risk, maximum floating loss or whether the periods are representative. No public monitored signal or separate public manual was linked from the listing or seller page.
Customer reviews: positive early feedback and a later complaint
Five ratings were displayed at the dated check. Earlier reviewers praised profit, execution and the developer’s support. Christoph described continuous VPS use; nick.aj described initial demo testing before purchase; Angel Larroca reported using the EA on real accounts. These are customer reports, not independently audited outcomes.
The June review by jrrrst is especially easy to misread: the customer described a cent account, modified settings and simultaneous gold and Bitcoin trading against the seller’s advice. Its very large claimed daily percentages are not evidence for the recommended gold-only setup or a standard USD account. In contrast, Le Duc Tran’s 2 September review is negative, and the accompanying comment reports stop-loss hits every day. The comment does not supply a complete account statement or settings, so the cause cannot be established here.
Both the praise and the loss complaint belong in the assessment. A small review sample, different settings and changing builds limit comparisons. We have not imported these third-party ratings into CheaperForex purchase reviews. Read all MQL5 reviews · Read the developer and customer discussion.
Who the EA is most appropriate for
Gold Liquidity V2 is best considered by someone prepared to test XAUUSD M1 execution, check aggregate position exposure and verify each protection setting. The developer’s $500 and $1,000 balance labels are configuration guidance, not guarantees. Fast execution and a VPS support operation, but they do not turn incomplete performance evidence into a proven edge.