Trust EA trades rollover reversals across nine Forex pairs with limit orders. Konstantin Kulikov offers MT4 and MT5 editions, each with stop-loss and grid configurations. The appeal is a specific trading window and adjustable execution controls. The main consideration is whether that small reversal survives your broker’s spreads, commissions and fills.
Our assessment: a focused strategy for traders prepared to compare presets and inspect execution. The linked MT5 account provides a useful forward record, but it does not establish identical results for MT4, every broker or the grid configurations. This review examines public listings, release notes, the March 2026 preset archive and the signal captured on September 29, 2026; we have not independently traded the EA. CheaperForex sells both editions.
Ready to Buy Trust EA MT5?
$239.99 with crypto · $299.99 by card
Official version · Instant download · Free lifetime updates · 7-day money-back guarantee
Using MetaTrader 4? Explore the separate MT4 edition.
The rollover idea and its execution trade-off
Trust looks for a reversal from short-lived price extremes around the daily rollover period. It places limit orders rather than chasing an established move. That gives the entry a defined price condition, but an order that never fills contributes nothing; one filled during a spread expansion can behave differently from a clean historical test.
Low market activity is not the same as low trading risk. Spreads can widen, liquidity can thin and holding costs can change around rollover. The relevant question is how this particular preset behaves on your intended account. General accusations about broker behavior are not evidence that another account will reproduce the developer’s results.
How stop-loss and grid presets differ
We inspected the developer’s public March 2026 Trust settings archive. Its platform-specific folders contain both approaches. The stop-loss files disable grid mode and permit buys and sells. They set virtual trading exits with a broker-side safety setting after rollover; these settings should not be described as a permanent broker-held stop on every position from entry.
The grid files instead enable averaging, use a 1.5 lot multiplier and are configured for buys. Their loss-closing parameter is set to 99.0. That is not a conservative default loss allowance, and a three-transaction setting does not make increasing exposure harmless. Inspect the exact parameters before deployment rather than assuming every Trust preset follows the advertised per-trade stop-loss signal.
The archive also contains timing variants and different sizing settings. MT4 stop-loss files use a funds-per-0.01-lot input of 50; the inspected MT5 stop-loss files use 100. Those are file settings, not recommended minimum deposits. Loading the same-looking preset name in the other platform is not proof of equal risk.
What the public MT5 signal shows
The linked Trust EA Darwinex signal runs on MetaTrader 5 and is marked as a real account on Darwinex-Live by MQL5, with 1:200 leverage. Public monitoring started May 1, 2026; the displayed history covered 22 weeks at our September 29 check. It is not a separate MT4 result.
- Reported growth
- 27.16%
- Trades and profit factor
- 499 trades; 1.56 profit factor
- Relative drawdown
- 8.17% by equity; 4.89% by balance
- Peak deposit load
- 85.30%
- Losing period
- July 2026: −1.93%; longest recorded losing run: 12 trades
The cash flows matter. MQL5 listed a €500 initial deposit, another €5,500 in deposits, €2,000 in withdrawals and €1,176.82 profit, leaving €5,176.82 balance and equity. Comparing the final balance with the first €500 would substantially misrepresent the return. The platform’s growth figure is the relevant displayed return measure.
Equity drawdown includes open losses; balance drawdown tracks closed results. Neither historical figure caps future loss. The 85.30% peak deposit load also shows why a modest drawdown statistic alone cannot describe the account’s margin exposure. Five months of monitoring is useful evidence, but it spans a limited set of market conditions.
The product’s current grid-signal link leads to the developer’s wider signal directory rather than one clearly identified matching grid account. We therefore do not present the Darwinex record as proof of the grid presets. The saved public page does not establish the exact preset and sizing used throughout the entire account history.
Choosing between MT4 and MT5
Both editions operate from one chart on any timeframe and cover EURUSD, GBPUSD, AUDUSD, USDCHF, USDCAD, EURGBP, EURAUD, GBPAUD and AUDCAD. These pairs share currencies, so nine symbols do not provide nine independent exposures. Assign distinct magic numbers to additional instances and examine their combined positions.
MT5 is the more useful edition for testing the entire basket together: the developer explicitly reserves simultaneous multi-symbol backtesting for its tester. MT4 remains an option for an existing MT4 account, but individual-symbol tests cannot reconstruct account-wide interactions. Use realistic tick data, spreads, commission and server-time assumptions; we have not reproduced the developer’s backtests.
The developer’s MT5 tester screenshot covers August 2022 to August 2025, with a $1,000 simulated starting deposit, 1:500 leverage, real-tick mode and 100 ms delay. These assumptions identify that particular simulation. The screenshot’s claim about avoiding overoptimization does not establish an independent out-of-sample or robustness test, and the chart is not MT4 live-account evidence.
On September 29, the source listings showed MT4 1.1, updated March 21, 2026, and MT5 1.7, updated December 19, 2025. The MT4 update reduced news-source requests. MT5’s history documents slippage adjustments, trading-hour controls, position-count management and a correction to the displayed opening time. These are dated source-release references, not verification of the standalone file supplied with an order.
Customer feedback: useful context, limited evidence
In a September 24, 2025 MQL5 review, Ben comments that you don’t have to have zero spread for the EA to work.
That is one user’s opinion about execution. The accompanying suggestions about passing stress tests are not published test results, and the comment predates several later MT5 revisions.
The MT4 listing contains an enthusiastic April 2026 review reporting a large gain over two weeks, without an account statement in the review. Such a short anecdote cannot establish sustainable risk or expected returns. Two other visible MT5 ratings have no written explanation. These are MQL5 customer opinions, kept separate from CheaperForex purchase reviews.
Who it suits
Trust is most relevant if you want a clearly timed Forex strategy and are willing to test its execution and exit configuration. Start the comparison with the stop-loss and grid distinction, then examine costs and combined exposure. The EA name and a positive signal curve are not substitutes for that work.
For another system by Konstantin Kulikov, Oil Bull EA MT5 trades oil with a different grid approach; its results should be assessed separately. Breakthrough Strategy EA MT4 is another existing product by the same developer.
Source references: Trust MT4 listing, Trust MT5 listing, MT4 release notes and MT5 release notes. Checked September 29, 2026.
Frequently asked questions
What strategy does Trust EA use?
Trust EA uses limit orders to trade price reversals around the Forex rollover period. It operates nine currency pairs from one chart, with different presets for individual stop-loss exits and grid management.
Does the Darwinex signal prove both Trust editions perform identically?
No. The linked signal is an MT5 account. It provides a forward record for that account's trading, not a separate MT4 result or proof that every grid and stop-loss preset performs identically across brokers.
Why can Trust EA's balance change differ from its reported growth?
The monitored account has received deposits and made a withdrawal. Comparing the final balance with its first deposit would mix trading returns with cash flows. Review MQL5's growth measure, profit, deposits and withdrawals together.
Which Trust EA edition is more useful for testing the nine-pair basket?
The developer specifies MT5 for simultaneous multi-symbol backtesting. MT4 can trade the multi-pair strategy, but individual-symbol tests cannot represent how the complete basket shares margin and currency exposure.
