Allylla Pullback Bot EA MT5 Review

Allylla Pullback Bot EA MT5 trades XAUUSD/GOLD pullbacks using market structure across multiple timeframes. Uttam Kumar Nandeibam’s system groups eight entry models into five strategies, each with defined adverse-move protection and trade management.

Our assessment: the appeal is a configurable gold pullback framework with independent trade exits and no grid or martingale recovery. It suits traders who want to control strategy overlap as well as position size. The main consideration is the short public account record, particularly where high exposure produces large percentage gains. The product listing and release note were rechecked on 13 November 2026, when the current version was 2.80. Account figures and screenshots below remain dated 11 November 2026. This is a source-based assessment, not a firsthand terminal test or independently reproduced backtest.

How the pullback model enters

Allylla analyses structure across several timeframes, then waits for a qualifying pullback after a structural move. Its entries differ from a breakout system that leaves Buy Stop or Sell Stop orders at surrounding levels. The developer describes eight entry models organised into five strategies, with no indicator-based entry signals, grid or martingale recovery.

The EA can run on any host-chart timeframe because it scans its own timeframes internally. XAUUSD/GOLD is the intended market, and a hedging account is recommended. Broker symbol specifications, minimum volume and volume steps still matter.

What changed in version 2.80?

The 12 November 2026 release note describes a minor bug fix for new entries being blocked when other open orders were present. The developer states that trading logic, trade management, settings and default values are unchanged. This is a release-note description, not an independently reproduced test of the fix.

Single-entry logic and simultaneous positions

The execution setting determines overlap. OneAnytime permits one position on the symbol; existing positions or pending orders block another entry. OnePerStrategy, the listing’s stated default, permits one position for each strategy. Other modes allow further directional overlap. Consequently, independent entries can accumulate exposure to the same gold move.

The developer suggests roughly 3-5% risk per trade. That is substantial position-level risk: five simultaneous positions sized at 3% each represent 15% combined nominal exposure before execution effects. This is an illustration of exposure, not a prediction that all five strategies will trade or lose together.

Sizing and protection settings

Fixed lots use the chosen volume. AutoLot can allocate volume per equity base amount or use a positive PercentageEquity setting, which overrides base-amount sizing. Capital buffers reduce the equity used in that calculation; they do not physically reserve funds or cap account losses. A maximum lot cap limits each new position.

Adverse-move protection is configured per strategy in account currency per 0.01 lot and scales with volume. The listing’s USD example ranges from 35 to 75 for 0.01 lot. The guide distinguishes broker-side protection from local monitoring: Put Hard Stop in the System enables a broker-side SL; when false, protection depends on the terminal staying running, connected and permitted to trade. The TP switch also distinguishes server-side and local targets where applicable. These switches should be checked rather than assuming every exit rests on the broker’s server.

News and session controls

The input guide documents rollover and weekend pauses, a reopening-gap filter and a selected weekday cutoff using broker server time. These controls block new entries while existing positions continue to be managed. Blocked signals consume their quota instead of waiting in a queue for later entry.

The high-impact USD news filter uses the terminal’s calendar and is bypassed in the Strategy Tester. A separate option determines whether unavailable calendar data blocks new entries. Forward operation therefore needs checking alongside historical tests. The developer’s claim that no dates are hard-coded out of the tests has not been independently verified.

Five linked accounts, with different exposure

The following are MQL5-reported snapshots from 11 November 2026, when the listing showed version 2.70. The platform labels these accounts as real, but this review does not independently verify deposits or establish which build produced every historical trade. They do not establish the performance of version 2.80. Account histories predate the product’s 11 November publication; their short samples do not establish long-term robustness.

Balanced RoboForex – 2397645

19.93% growth; 23 trades; 3.58% equity drawdown; 0.08% balance drawdown. RoboForex-ECN, leverage 1:500. The account Started field shows 29 October 2026.

High-exposure RoboForex – 2396795

173.49% growth; 21 trades; 24.55% equity drawdown; maximum deposit load 28.92%. RoboForex-ECN, leverage 1:500. Started 23 October 2026.

IC Markets – 2398788

69.65% growth; 20 trades; 4.39% equity drawdown; 7.02% balance drawdown. ICMarketsSC-MT5-3. The platform lists leverage 1:5000.

Vantage – 2398859

85.17% growth; 14 trades; 6.01% equity drawdown. VantageMarkets-Live 13, leverage 1:500.

TradeMax Global – 2398791

60.84% growth; 13 trades; 4.50% equity drawdown; 2.36% balance drawdown. TradeMaxGlobal-Live, leverage 1:1000.

The latter three accounts show Started dates of 6-7 November 2026. The balanced account carries warnings about too few deals and a newly opened account. The high-exposure RoboForex account adds warnings that rapid and high average monthly growth may indicate high risk. Its much larger growth figure should be read beside its 24.55% equity drawdown, small starting balance and young history.

What the evidence can establish

The records provide examples of deployments at different brokers and exposure levels. They do not isolate broker effects from position sizing, execution settings or different starting dates. A rising line or a run of profitable trades cannot establish how the system handles a sustained adverse period. Past account results and historical simulations do not guarantee future returns.

At the 11 November 2026 check, the listing had no customer reviews and its single public comment was the developer’s invitation to ask questions, rather than buyer feedback. This is a dated feedback snapshot. No third-party rating has been added to CheaperForex purchase reviews.

Compare the developer’s other products

CheaperForex also lists Osloma Gold EA MT5 and Osloma FlipPro MT5. Their grid and basket-management approaches differ from Allylla’s independent entries and exits. Read the Osloma Gold review and FlipPro review when comparing those trade-management choices.

Check the current sources

Read the official Allylla listing, release history and public input and setup guide. Inspect the accounts directly: balanced RoboForex, high-exposure RoboForex, IC Markets, Vantage and TradeMax Global. Any signal-copy subscription is a separate service from the EA purchase.