Updated 18 September 2026. Source-based editorial review; not a hands-on trading test.
Ghost Scalper trades selective gold breakouts and momentum moves on MT5. Ghost A, B, C and D have separate entries, management and risk settings, with execution monitoring built into the dashboard.
Our assessment: Ghost offers useful strategy-level controls and execution diagnostics. The multiple broker accounts make comparison possible, but their short histories, differing returns and substantial realized drawdowns argue for cautious sizing and broker-specific evaluation.
Ghost Scalper MT5 pricing and details

- Developer source link: Ghost Scalper on MQL5
- Live signal links: Account 2387161, Account 2387162, Account 2386083, Account 2387100, Account 2386105
Set the risk of the whole strategy mix
Each Ghost strategy can be enabled separately and has its own risk settings. Several can trade together. Select the total exposure you are willing to accept before allocating it across A–D; four strategy names do not automatically mean four independent sources of risk.
Broker-side stops and internal protection
The current system combines a broker-side stop with internal protection that monitors stop/freeze levels, rejected modifications, slippage and fast markets. If a stop adjustment is rejected, internal logic can remain active while the terminal is running. It cannot guarantee a fill or protect an offline terminal in the same way as an accepted broker-side order.
Execution dashboard and news controls
The dashboard reports actual execution time, slippage, spread, drawdown and strategy activity. Broker Quality is not merely a ping score. BIG, SMALL and OFF modes allow different display loads. An optional USD news filter can block entries around NFP, CPI, PCE, FOMC and labour-market releases. The developer recommends XAUUSD on H1 and a VPS near the broker server; quiet periods can be normal.
Live account evidence — checked 18 September 2026
Four individual Ghost signals were checked: TMGM showed 168.98% growth and 30.33% relative balance drawdown; VT Markets 118.58% and 34.63%; Vantage 16.32% and 16.17%; Ultima 203.18% and 16.10%. Their reported relative equity drawdowns were 9.69%, 10.17%, 8.93% and 12.12% respectively. All showed only five to six weeks of account history, starting with €100–€200. VT Markets had €120 later deposits and Ultima €100. The separately linked Colosseum/Ghost/Tycoon portfolio is a combined-strategy account, not Ghost-only evidence.
The spread in reported outcomes matters more than picking the largest growth figure. Vantage’s headline growth and cash profit do not reconcile as a simple return on the displayed initial deposit; we retain MQL5’s own growth figure rather than substituting a calculated one. Deposits, monitoring history and platform calculations must be considered before comparing accounts. The combined portfolio showed 45.77% relative balance drawdown, which cannot be attributed to Ghost alone. Copying warnings and very short average holding times further limit transferability.
How to read the older screenshots
The images below are retained from the earlier article so their original evidence remains available. Their figures, software interfaces and settings are historical. They must not be read as a current live snapshot or as an independent test of the latest release. A backtest models historical conditions; it does not establish future returns or reproduce every broker’s execution.






Customer feedback in context
The listing showed 20 reviews at 4.43. Recent comments praise support and live results; the existing historical feedback also raised questions about tests outside the showcased period. Neither a positive review nor several small live accounts proves robustness across years. Use the full review history and test different market periods with the configuration you intend to run.
Read the complete developer-marketplace reviews. These are MQL5 customer opinions, separate from CheaperForex purchase ratings.
A practical evaluation checklist
Record the broker, exact symbol, installed build, preset, sizing mode and active strategies before testing. Include commission, spread and realistic execution assumptions. Inspect open exposure and losing periods as well as closed-trade profit. Start with a demo or the smallest practical size, and compare behaviour rather than expecting the published account’s percentage return. Keep enough capital and margin for adverse movement; no stop or daily-loss setting guarantees an exact cash limit during gaps or execution failures.
Who it suits
Ghost offers useful strategy-level controls and execution diagnostics. The multiple broker accounts make comparison possible, but their short histories, differing returns and substantial realized drawdowns argue for cautious sizing and broker-specific evaluation.